Gor! will proseeth or not.
Lowever to well to tale des I hugand that
'60/L "21-20T1
(879*%1)
́MG P ́V 'E0/11 0009 '83--120°02 M 16681)
to our
derp any
how
or
the question whethe
whithe
m 9993/02.
I might
427
The misection of telephome asketric "
after
A
In may think A.
su 955 M Reilly's
"Aleyraphic" in line 17
is not putaps,
x
absolutely necessary
but it does /
JRig/og.
think
cany
እ
expert
an
this drap is a sufficient report.
The core enclosed unals one fact which
nguies conson. The company maintain that it is not
open
to the Sort to alter
the lerons & the orter as macked without the Cos consent. I am not sme hat
I think that legally the depilature of
the Coloney has a sight to amend
ang adinance Equitally, & comere, the Co might claim to be consulted; and for that reason it is descritte to examine
the proposed amendments shown in the setored win.
See 3 "Gut sept" to "Get"
mo substituted
Sau 10 32 11902 (48591/02) This sade is the only amendment made by that
a
or which is upeated by the b of the
деву
he has taken to
news
*
Deacons,
of 20. Aug.
Bill the to wire wit of the proposal
The are
out the clear intention f
The last part & see 3 cannot be showed
smis it makes the effect of the see hom
wtroopertur
I don't thwith the to c. vasonally object to
the amendment proposed in see 4.
This provides that when the disputs in
not me which in
special
#
cau
within the meaning & the (int Rocedeme Code 16.
where farts
an
Sme
achon
art
dissati
Hudy
he brought. I am not
that the amendment is aller
It can
hardly he held I think that in
the absence ( special provon the Gastatte has no right of action : me but it does no harm
sie 5 in
menta
Page 480Page 481
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.